主控大律師伍家聰 Prosecuting Counsel Simon K C Ng (Barrister) 俾法官沈小民寸 - 『共謀者原則』唔係咁解你返去自己諗清楚【案件編號：DCCC908、918/19】

主控大律師伍家聰 Prosecuting Counsel Simon K C Ng (Barrister) 俾法官沈小民寸

https://hk.appledaily.com/local/20210219/JOB3V7RYRJDLLFQZQF3LWRMN4E/

沈官更一度向主控大律師伍家聰稱：「『共謀者原則』唔係咁解你返去自己諗清楚。」【案件編號：DCCC908、918/19】10.1串謀暴動案六男女全部脫罪

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wasted Costs Order Against Hong Kong Barrister James H M McGowan of Admiralty Chambers - HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189

Wasted Costs Order Against Hong Kong Barrister James H M McGowan of Admiralty Chambers - HKSAR v Apelete [2019] 5 HKLRD 574 [2019] HKCA 1189 https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=125051&currpage=T https://disgustingbarristers.blogspot.com/2021/05/hong-kong-barrister-james-h-m-mcgowan-of-admitalty-chambers-ordered-to-pay-wasted-costs.html 36. Before us, Mr McGowan candidly admitted that his actions (or lack thereof) were such as to bring him within the meaning of s.18 of the CCCO. In particular, he accepted that on his part there had been undue delay as well as a repeated failure to comply with the Court's directions, which amounted to serious professional misconduct. 47.  Whatever the position may have been in respect of funding, the applicant was legally aided as from 17 August 2018. There can be no excuse for either Mr Mohnani or Mr McGowan failing to comply with the Court's directions thereafter and no conceivable justification for allowing 7 month
Read more

Wasted Costs Order Against Cap Chan & Co Solicitors (陳少青律師事務所) for Conducting Hopeless Proceedings - So Kam (蘇金) v Guildford Ltd [2021] 2 HKLRD 319 [2021] HKDC 340 - HHJ Andrew Li

Wasted Costs Order Against Cap Chan & Co Solicitors (陳少青律師事務所) for Conducting Hopeless Proceedings - So Kam (蘇金) v Guildford Ltd [2021] 2 HKLRD 319 [2021] HKDC 340 - HHJ Andrew Li https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=134391&currpage=T
Read more

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam - DCCJ 1917/2018 - [2021] HKDC 378 - LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋)

Milton Lai Fabricated Evidence in Court - Said DDJ George Lam  DCCJ 1917/2018 [2021] HKDC 378 LAI KO CHOY v LAI KIN (黎健) & KWONG LAI SIM (鄺麗嬋) 90. I find that Milton Lai was fabricating his evidence in court. It seems to me that Milton Lai was trying to salvage the weakness in the plaintiff’s case where the plaintiff cared nothing about the mortgage. I reject Milton Lai’s evidence entirely in relation to the purchase of the Property or any discussion about the mortgage. I did not believe a financial consultant could have advised his father when acquiring a property without any of the above-mentioned essential information.
Read more